#Surfshark extension safari free
#Surfshark extension safari mac
#Surfshark extension safari windows

Surfshark tells me that its development team is working on the issue, so hopefully OpenVPN speeds will improve in the future.

#Surfshark extension safari windows

If you want to optimize your speeds with Surfshark, I recommend connecting through the WireGuard protocol, especially if you're a Windows user. Still, the inconsistent nature of Surfshark's overall speed performance was a major disappointment.

#Surfshark extension safari mac

That said, Surfshark's OpenVPN speeds through my Mac were fairly respectable (34% speed loss), though not overly impressive. Losing more than three quarters of your base speed can be a real downer if you're a gamer, torrenter or like to stream content. I have found that VPN speeds through Windows machines tend to be marginally slower across the board than they typically are through a Mac, but other VPNs I tested through Windows didn't register such a dramatic drop in speeds as Surfshark did. While Surfshark sometimes offered good speeds, I never knew what to expect from different protocols or devices. However, Surfshark's speeds through the OpenVPN protocol on my Windows laptop were abysmal, cutting my base speeds by a whopping 76%. Surfshark's speeds through the WireGuard VPN protocol from Ohio were excellent, causing my speeds to dip a mere 8% below my base internet speeds - above the top speeds I saw from ExpressVPN. And with ExpressVPN upgrading its server fleet to 10Gbps servers, I'm hoping to see even faster and more consistent speeds from the provider in the future. The best speed performance I got through WireGuard with ExpressVPN was from my other testing location in Ohio, where I registered an 11% speed loss. The best speed performance I got out of ExpressVPN was through the OpenVPN protocol from my testing location in Hungary, where I registered a 9% speed loss compared to my base speeds. The only other VPN that performed more consistently during my most recent speed tests was NordVPN.

In my most recent speed tests in the first quarter of 2023, I registered an 18% average speed loss with ExpressVPN and an average 40% speed loss with Surfshark.ĮxpressVPN was consistently speedy regardless of which protocol, device or location I tested it through.

#Surfshark extension safari free

$2.49/mo + 2 months free at Surfshark Speed winner: ExpressVPN by a wide margin, thanks to Surfshark's inconsistency and sputtering OpenVPN speedsįinding the fastest VPN is a priority for most VPN users, so we put VPNs through rigorous speed testing. Read more: Best VPN Services of 2023 ExpressVPN vs. I also carefully evaluated each provider's features, privacy policy, terms of service, transparency efforts and customer support.īoth are first-class VPN providers, but ExpressVPN edges Surfshark in this head-to-head. I conducted hundreds of individual speed tests for each provider to multiple locations and through multiple VPN protocols and platforms, along with leak tests and kill switch tests. This comparison between ExpressVPN and Surfshark is based on extensive testing and thorough evaluations of each service's overall value, privacy features and speeds.

Both are excellent options for anyone who wants a VPN that offers first-rate privacy protections, but can also reliably handle geoblocks when streaming content online. ExpressVPN is CNET's Editors' Choice for best overall VPN, and Surfshark is CNET's Editors' Choice for best value VPN. ExpressVPN and Surfshark are two of CNET's best VPN picks, both earning Editors' Choice designations.